October 15, 2018
Makeover Monday: The Under-representation of Women in the House of Representatives
What works well?
- It's simple and easy to understand.
- Nice and clean; there's no unnecessary decoration
- Using colors that represent the parties
- Using a line chart to represent change over time
- Labeling the end point makes us aware of the current situation
What could be improved?
- The stepped lines are necessary.
- The ratio of the chart looks strange to me.
- The title could be more impactful.
- Adding a y-axis would add context.
What I did
- Focus on the % of women and men in each party
- Use the party colors, but still be able to distinguish men and women
- Use a line to break up the area chart
- Use an impactful title and subtitle
- Use a viz in tooltip to show BANs
November 19, 2016
The United States Electoral College | A Genius Representation of the People
This turned out to be a fantastic civic learning experience for me. And exploring the data with Tableau helped me understand how it all works. I know a lot of people, particularly those I work with in the U.K., that are confused by this election and how the popular candidate didn't win. To aid in this understanding, I've created this story points visualisation to explain how the electoral college works, how electoral votes are allocated, and how the election would have turned out if the electoral college was based strictly on population.
July 11, 2016
Makeover Monday: The Orlando Mass Shooting & the Reaction of Representatives
As a second take on the Makeover Monday topic this week of what legislators spoke about after the Orlando mass shooting, I thought a better view might be the proportion of representatives who spoke about each topic. Presenting the data this way help provide better context for the overall picture while allowing you to compare both across the parties and within a party.
I think a donut chart works well here because we only have two parts to each donut and the number call out the amount that’s of interest. In addition, this enabled me to design a static visualisation that doesn’t require interactivity. For me, it’s much hard to design static, mobile-friendly visualisations than any other type at the moment.
Makeover Monday: What Lawmakers Spoke About After the Orlando Mass Shooting
This week’s Makeover Monday is a bit of a dark topic that gives us a glimmer into the how politicians in the US respond to a tragedy. Yes, this is a single mass shooting, but they occur nearly every day in America and the responses from politicians are now all too standard. The Orlando mass shooting likely got more attention because it happened at a LGBT club. This and other tragedies beg the question: When will America get its act together?
The chart that we’re reviewing this week is by the grapics team at The Washington Post.
What works well?
- It’s neatly organised in a 3x3 grid.
- The semi-circles are all sized relative to each other.
- It’s very easy to understand.
- They used colors that are automatically associated with the two political parties
- Everything is clearly labeled.
- It’s not over-cluttered.
What could be improved?
- The chart implies that there are equal representatives in both parties. However, Republicans have 247 seats while Democrats have 187.
- Using semi-circles makes the shapes hard to compare.
- It's difficult to compare across the topics.
- There should be an easier way to which party talks more about each topic
Given these changes I would like to see, I’ve create this version that shows how many representatives talked about each topic in a tornado chart format. I then included a circle with a number inside to show which party talked about the topic more and by how many representatives. Lastly, I added lots of summary details in the tooltips.
