• Clear title
• Line chart is a good choice for a time series

• There are too many colors.
• What's the focus?
• The legend takes up a lot of space.
• The chart ratio is too flat.
• Overall, it's confusing and harder than necessary to find patterns.

• The data by region is ordered alphabetically, making it easy to find each region.
• The bar chart is sorted by largest to smallest.
• Nice filtering options

• A diverging color palette should only be used when there is a logical midpoint or goal. I don't see those in this viz.
• The squares are hard to understand.
• I don't find the map very useful. It would be more useful if it zoomed in when a region is selected.
• There's no title.
• There's too much text.
• The bar chart seems to go out past the edge, or at least visually it appears that way.

• I created a KPI scorecard so that I could understand the patterns for the overall or an individual country. Are literacy rates improving or regressing?
• Show the distribution of the rates of the countries within each region
• Within each region, which countries are above or below the median for that region?
• How has the literacy rate changed over time?
• Allow simple filtering options.

• Circular bar charts are horrible for comparisons.
• The title is meaningless.
• The lines start thin, get thicker, then get thin again. Why?
• The title and the center of the chart are the same. That's certainly unnecessary redundancy.

• Using a continuous color palette
• There are no exceptionally large countries compared to the others, so a filled map is a good choice.
• Normalizing the data to make comparisons across countries more relevant.
• Using grey for countries with no data.
• Good title and subtitle

• If there is data across years, it would provide additional context to the data. In other words, is the situation improving?
• Make the title bigger; it's too small compared to the large map.

• Compared the metrics between fistula and non-fistula countries
• Look at change over time
• Figure out how to deal with all of the nulls
• Be done

• The title explains what the chart is displaying.
• The x-axis and y-axis are easy to understand.
• Excluding 1993 and 2018 since they are partial years.
• The chart has the proper height-to-width ratio.

• The title could be a bit more informative. Something like "Over the last 24 years, there have been only three weekdays where women has constructed at least 50% of the crosswords."
• There are too many colors, making the chart distracting and the lines hard to follow.

• Separated the days into separate charts so the trends for each weekday would be easier to follow
• Created sparklines and highlighted the high point for each weekday
• Labeled the values for 1994 and 2017 for context
• Included a BAN for the overall percentage for each weekday
• Created a mobile layout
• Shaded every other row to distinguish the weekdays and help guide the eye across the chart

• The design of the responses as a stacked bar chart is easy to understand.
• The responses are ordered from highest to lowest.
• Women and men are assigned difference colors in the text
• Good title and subtitles
• Colors are easy enough to distinguish

• Comparisons between women and men in the same categories are hard to make
• Maybe there could be an easier way to distinguish between poo and pee

• Do something quick (like 10 minutes); I'm late for MM for the first time ever, but it's ok because I'm on holiday with my Dad and Brother.
• Make the comparisons easier
• Use colors that are a bit easier to associate to the men and women categories

• It's simple and easy to understand.
• Nice and clean; there's no unnecessary decoration
• Using colors that represent the parties
• Using a line chart to represent change over time
• Labeling the end point makes us aware of the current situation

• The stepped lines are necessary.
• The ratio of the chart looks strange to me.
• The title could be more impactful.
• Adding a y-axis would add context.

• Focus on the % of women and men in each party
• Use the party colors, but still be able to distinguish men and women
• Use a line to break up the area chart
• Use an impactful title and subtitle
• Use a viz in tooltip to show BANs

What works well?

• The bands for +/- 20% from the actuals helps give context to the estimates from policymakers.
• The country titles and subtitles for the topic make is easy to know what each chart is about.

• What do the green diamonds mean? Apparently they are policymaker estimates, but there's no indication of that in the dashboard.
• Why are these topics picked for these countries?
• Why is Senegal excluded?
• A more impactful and descriptive title would help.
• It's unnecessary to include the source and legend with each chart.

• Try to understand the data; easier said than done
• Understand the spread of each topic within each country
• Show ALL responses
• Allow the user to filter and drill in to the topic they are interested in.
• Stick to the overall style guidelines from Equal Measures 2030
• Include BANs for the number of policymakers that estimated within +/- 20% of the actual values